A 'mini Free Hit' as well as a 'mini Wildcard'??

 

FPL's unnecessarily generous gift of extra Free Transfers in Gameweek 16 (another pointless innovation this year, supposedly meant to ease the possible impact of departures for the African Cup of Nations - although that has never been a big issue in FPL; and this year, it's a complete non-event, as no-one with any sense currently has any African players other than Bryan Mbeumo) is effectively a mini-Wildcard, enabling us to undertake a modest squad rebuild in mid-December.

However, it must be noted that this is not a gift of a fixed number of transfers (5), but only a top-up - to a maximum number of 5 Free Transfers. Hence, in order to take full advantage of it, you have to use up any existing Free Transfers you have in Gameweek 15 (e.g., if you still have 2 saved transfers going into GW16, you only get 3 new ones, to bring you up to the total of 5 all told).

I quite like the idea of trying to save up some transfers over the next few gameweeks (though that might not be possible, as injuries tend to come thick and fast at this time of year!), so that you can play 2 or 3 together in Gameweek 15 - perhaps even the full quota of 5 FTs in one fell swoop, if you're already carrying forward some saved ones. 

Since you'll have the opportunity for a similar big shake-up in the very next gameweek, with the AFCON Christmas present, this could be a one-week-only revision of your team - in effect, an extra Free Hit! 

But as this would only be a 'virtual' Free Hit, not the actual chip, you would be able to to play another chip that week. And as I said the other week, Gameweek 15 is a moderately promising prospect for a Bench Boost play, with a number of unbalanced fixtures you might want to exploit. (Although it's a bit of a risky bet for that chip, as there may be a high risk of fatigue, injury absences, or sudden rest rotations in what is the third gameweek scheduled within 7 days.)  Even for just the starting eleven, though, it's an unusual group of fixtures where you could benefit from putting out a one-off custom team. And 'optimizing' for this gameweek opportunity with saved transfers would enable you to hang on to your actual Free Hit (well, assuming you've still got it...) as insurance against a possible game-postponement emergency later in the month.  Something to think about.

Always risky to play a chip after a break

 

Well, certainly one of the 'bonus' chips (and as I said yesterday, the Free Hit should really be regarded as one of these too). Though, in fact, even a Wildcard play is a bit of a shakey proposition directly after an international break, as you really want your new selections to return good points for you straight away.... and in these gameweeks, there is too much uncertainty about that.

WHY?  Because the disruption of the usual club routines for the better part of two weeks tends to have a negative impact on team and individual form, and makes game outcomes more unpredictable.

Certainty, of course, is impossible in a game like FPL; but if you're going to risk one of your valuable bonus chips, or implement a major rebuild with the Wildcard, you want to have a high degree of confidence that all of your players are likely to have good games. And you just can't have that level of confidence about likely performances in the gameweek straight after a break, just as you can't in the early weeks of the season, after the summer lay-off.

Even if players aren't physically fatigued by long-distance flights and heavy game-minutes, and haven't picked up some injury niggle that hasn't yet been publicly announced, they can often be emotionally depleted by a particularly high-stakes game (especially in this most recent break, where World Cup qualification was on the line for many teams). But more importantly, their usual routines have been broken: they've been playing with different teammates, working with different coaches, implementing different game tactics and set-piece routines to what they're used to with their clubs. And when they return, they have limited time to get back in the swing of things, with only a day or two of training before their next league match; detailed tactical preparation, in particular, can be very difficult on such a tight schedule. And even the players who stayed at their clubs, while they should be feeling fresh and well-rested, will also have missed out on full training with their regular teammates for 10 days or so.

This is why we get so many wild fluctuations in form, so many 'unexpected' results straight after a break - and thus, why it's such a big, and probably unwise, gamble to play one of your FPL chips in such a gameweek.

[I'm here trying to kick off a new series, where I aim to sum up a key idea about FPL rather more pithily than usual (though I don't have the knack of brevity, I know!), with the main point being stated in the post title. I realise at least some of the entries in my other attempt at a more concise series of posts, 'In a nutshell', may also qualify for this new category. I may have to ponder on whether there's any value in having two labels.]

How much is a Bench Boost worth?

I thought I'd better follow up on yesterday's post about calculating the value of the Triple Captain chip with a companion piece on its cousin, the other 'bonus chip', the Bench Boost.

As with the Triple Cap, FPL managers often like to self-deceive about the extent of their success in playing this chip. Because the points scored by all 15 squad players will be counted for the gameweek when this chip is in play, they will often protest that team selection "doesn't mattter" - and so contrive to accidentally-on-purpose leave some of their best players on the bench. If 'bench players' end up recording 2 or 3 - or even 4! - of their best individual scores of the week, then of course it will appear that their bench collectively produced enormous points,... and that can all be credited to a canny deployment of the Bench Boost chip, so these folks like to claim. But of course, that just ain't so.

Even if we go through the motions of trying to make a normal team selection, with the players who look likely to have the week's shakiest points prospects left on the bench, any of us may still fall prey to this idea that "it doesn't really matter" and be a bit lazy or hasty in deciding the starting eleven; even if we're not consciously stacking the bench with some of our more promising prospects, we might subconsciously be guilty of it. 

And even if, by a freak of good fortune, the 4 poorest prospects left on your bench have returned uncommonly well, contrary to your honest expectations - that isn't worth much if a lot of your starters have returned 'blanks'. The Bench Boost is indeed a reward for collective excellence, and you ought to evaluate it in terms of the overall return from all 15 players.

I follow two 'rules of thumb' for gauging the success of playing my Bench Boost:

1)  Decide my 'bench players' after the event, based on the lowest points returned from my squad (bearing in mind the 'formation rules' on eligible team selection): thus, I only count 4 of my lowest player scores as the value of the Bench Boost.

2)  Consider my squad total score against the gameweek's 'Global Average', to get an idea of how much bettter I did - if at all - than in a typical non-Bench Boost gameweek. (I typically manage around 10 points better than the 'Global Average'; in a 'good' week, around 15 or so better. So, I don't consider I've had a successful Bench Boost unless it's put me at least 25-30 points above the 'Global Average'. I'll make mental adjustments to that rough scale of comparison, based on how high-scoring or low-scoring a gameweek it was. But in most gameweeks, 15 points above 'Global Average' would probably still represent a very poor return on the Bench Boost, and 20-25 points barely adequate.)

Now, in practice, your Bench Boost is rarely going to be worth all that much - because, inevitably, you have your weakest players left on the bench. And, very often, you'll find that at least one of your squad doesn't play that week for some reason, so you'll only have 3 players (or sometimes even fewer....) contributing from your bench. Typically your bench consists of a back-up goalkeeper, a rarely-used (and perhaps ultra-cheap) 5th defender, and whoever your other 2 weakest players look likely to be on that week's fixtures. It's not a recipe for huge points!

That being the case, the Bench Boost can benefit significantly more from a Double Gameweek than the Triple Captain does: because these are players who are unlikely to produce any big returns, even minimum 'appearance points' from a second fixture will give a useful proportional boost to their total for the gameweek. However, if you follow my austere policy of only counting your lowest-returning players as comprising the value of your Bench Boost, you really need just about the entire squad to be enjoying a double-fixture (if only your usual bench players have double fixtures, they'd probably become preferred starters for that gameweek, and your 'true' bench, with only single fixtures. would probably not score quite as well) - and BIG Double Gameweeks like that don't happen any more. (The only week where we could sometimes see 12-16 Premier League teams enjoying a Double Gameweek at the same time was when FA Cup Quarter-Final participants would have their League games from that weekend all rescheduled to the same gameweek [and that didn't always happen; sometimes they were split...]. But since last season, the Premier League is suspending its match programme on the Quarter-Final weekend, so we don't get any postponements from that any more.)

This season, we've been given the novelty gimmick of a 2nd Bench Boost, only valid for the first half of the season - when there are no Double Gameweeks anyway! And as I observed in relation to the Triple Captain chip earlier in the season, now that Double Gameweeks are so few and so small, there's no reliable advantage in them any more (to be attractive possibilities for etiher type of Bonus Chip, at least one of the two fixtures for each of your players needs to be against a really easy opponent; and you have no idea if that is going to be the case until very shortly beforehand). 

It is a huge risk to wait until the last few weeks of the season on such a slim possibility of a slightly enhanced return for those chips; it's certainly not worth passing up favourable combinations of fixtures in gameweeks earlier in the season.

As I mentioned last week, it's best to stay agile and be prepared to play your Bench Boost opportunistically - any time when you feel really confident that all 15 of your squad players are going to start, and most of them, at least, are facing promising fixtures.

Of course, it also helps if you've managed to assemble a particularly strong squad, and one that is especially targeted towards the gameweek's weaker fixtures. In the past, we've generally liked to try to play the Bench Boost chip immediately following a Wildcard, so that our squad is fully optimized for form and fitness, and for the coming week's fixtures. 

Since last season, the new rule allowing us to bank up to 5 Free Transfers has effectively given us the theoretical opportunity of further 'mini-Wildcard' plays, where we could substantially remodel our squads if we've managed to save up extra transfers for a few weeks. In practice, it's incredibly difficult to save 5 FTs - and probably self-harming to try! - but being able to use even 2 or 3 transfers at once can be a significant advantage in optimizing the squad for a Bench Boost attempt. And, of course, remodelling this way, rather than with a Wildcard, enables you to make your changes right on the eve of the gameweek, thereby minimizing the risk of injuries removing some of your squad (a major hazard, if you're having to 'set up' for your Bench Boost using a Wildcard the week before).

Also, this season we have the further unnecessary gimmick of being given additional Free Transfers in Gameweek 16 (supposedly to ease the impact of players departing for AFCON; but at the moment, it's looking very unlikely that anyone will own any African players... apart from Bryan Mbeumo). The odd way this GIFT is being implemented - giving us extra Free Transfers, up to a maximum holding of 5 of them - means that, in order to best take advantage of this measure, we need to use up all of our existing Free Transfers by Gameweek 15. And if we've managed to save up quite a few of them, Gameweek 15 might then be a promising opportunity for the first Bench Boost. Or Gameweek 16, when we'll suddenly find ourselves magically in possession of another 5 Free Transfers. Or possibly even in Gameweeks 17 or 18, when we should still be reaping the advantages of those recent major rebuilds.  (FPL's needless largesse in Gameweek 16 could also be seen as giving us an additional 'mini' Free Hit in the preceding Gameweek: we could use saved Free Transfers to substantially recast our squad for one week only, undoing all of the changes again immediately with the extra transfers being given us for the start of AFCON.)   [I wrote a follow-up piece here - with a bit more detail on this issue of which gameweeks (in the first half of the current season) look most propitious for possibly playing the Bench Boost.]

However, even if you have managed to optimally 'set up' your squad to use this chip, you should consider 10-15 points - fairly counted - for your Bench Boost as adequate; anything around 20 is a very good return; and 25+ is absolutely outstanding.

But, again, as with the Triple Captain, you should temper your expectations, and realise that the chip can easily return little or nothing. If you have a dismal Bench Boost score this season,.... maybe you'll get a big one next time. That's how the game goes.

'Ideal' time to use a Wildcard?

 

Well, of course, a lot of people already blew their first Wildcard early in the season (which can be a legitimate choice - but only if you've got off to a really, really bad start; and most FPL managers have no idea of what truly constitutes such a really, really bad start). And an awful lot more have chosen to use it over the current international break (which is also a stratagem with something to recommend it - and I should probably do a little post just on that at some point).

However, in an ideal world, you would:

a)  Save it as long as possible - because the longer you wait, the more sure you are that you need to use it. (And also, of course, you are running out of later - possibly better - opportunities to use it as you approach its expiry date!)

b)  Save it for a real emergency - such as being hit with 5 or 6 injuries or suspensions in the same week. (It can happen!)

c)  Save it for a gameweek when it is likely to have the most impact for you, because - regardless of the form of particular teams or players - it is quite likely that you might want to make a lot of changes to your squad because of a 'turn' in the fixtures: a significant shift in fixture-difficulty from 'mostly bad' to 'mostly good' (or vice versa!) for a number of teams, all happening at around the same time. Such a 'turn' usually occurs at least once or twice in each half of the season. But, of course, your interpretation of how dramatic such a 'turn' may be - or whether it properly counts as one at all - will be affected by relative swings in form between teams. So, you can't predict with absolute confidence at the start of the season when the most important 'turns' in fixture-difficulty will occur (although a lot of people try to).

Now, in the first half of the season this year, we see that there's potentially quite a major 'turn' around Gameweeks 10 and 11.

Bournemouth, after challenging assignments in their next two away games, face a little run of much softer opponents, starting with Aston Villa in GW11. Chelsea are already in a pretty good run (nothing much to fear apart from that game against Arsenal at the end of November - and at least that's at home), but things get even easier after their away game at Spurs in.... GW11. Crystal Palace have a great run almost all the way through to the end of the year from GW10 onwards, after they've got their visit to Arsenal out of the way. Everton could take a battering in their next two against City and Spurs, but then have 6 much more inviting fixtures, starting in GW11. Liverpool are already in a dream of a sequence, with away games against City and Spurs their only likely speed-bumps between now and the end of the year. Manchester United are away to Liverpool this weekend, but might fancy their chances of starting a revival with the fairly kind run of fixtures they have starting from GW9 (and, given how bad they've been so far this season, most FPL managers are probably going to want to wait a week or two to see such a turnaround clearly starting to happen, before they move in for any United players).

As 'turns' go, it's not perhaps especially dramatic; but it's definitely there - and it's really the only one we've got to look forward to in this first half of the 2025-26 season. So, if you fancy pivoting towards more players from these teams with suddenly improving fixtures,.... it might be nice to make a whole raft of changes all at once, round about Gameweek 10. If you still have your Wildcard, that is.

These are the kinds of things you have to watch out for in choosing when to play a Wildcard - rather than just reaching for it as a comfort blanket the first time your team has a bad weekend.

Dilemmas of the Week - Gameweek 4 (25/26)

  

Gameweek 3 (seems a long time ago now, doesn't it?) saw quite a few irksome new injuries, to add to all the other early-season uncertainties of flakey form, less-than-100% fitness, and erratic team selection that so plague us early in the season. Now, we've got to face the further imponderables of possibly disrupted line-ups and evolving tactics because of the flood of new transfers this year. Many players returning from international duty may be a little fatigued, or carrying slight knocks - yet will still turn out for their club this weekend, despite being far below their best. And, of course, there's the perennial hazard in these fixtures that many of the South American players will be rested simply because they've had such a long flight back only a couple of days before the next fixture. Plus, of course, the usual pattern of regular team training and tactical preparation has been interrupted by the two-week international break, so any form we may have thought we'd seen emerging in the opening weeks is now out of the window - and we're effectively starting the season again from scratch. And yet.... some people (rather a lot, by the look of it!) are still playing their Wildcard this week!!!  (Others, even more daft, are tossing away their Free Hit - in what is probably one of the most flakey, topsy-turvy, unpredictable weekends of the whole season - when we just don't have any confidence in exactly who's going to start, let alone who's going to play well.)

I'm trying to streamline these weekly round-ups a bit from last year, restricting myself for the most part to just the injuries etc. affecting players that are likely to have a major significance in FPL; and also, of course, only to new injuries - I figure everyone should be aware of players who've already been ruled out for some time!  

[For some years, I have found the 'Injuries & Bans' summary on Fantasy Football Scout the most reliable resource for this kind of information; although this site, Premier League Injuries, is a very good alternative (often a little quicker to update, I think - though it did go through a bit of a glitchy period for a while last year).  Go check these out for more comprehensive coverage. 

I see the Fantasy Premier League site has added an improved 'Player Availability' page this year (though hidden under 'The Scout' tab?!). That also seems to be reasonably comprehensive and up-to-date, but god knows how it's supposed to be 'organised' - maybe by 'date of injury'? Obviously, arranging it by club and alphabetical order would be more sensible; but the denizens of FPL Towers seem to have a deep aversion to the sensible.]

So, what are the conundrums we face ahead of Gameweek 4 of the new season?

Does anybody need to be moved out because of injury?

William Saliba, who had appeared to pick up a hamstring problem early in the last league game against Liverpool, was apparently just feeling too much discomfort in the ankle he'd sprained slightly in the warm-up (is deliberate misdirection on injuries via play-acting also part of Arteta's policy now?); he has done some training since, and might be straight back in this week. Martin Odegaard should definitely be back, after good performances with Norway this week. Ben White also appears to be fit again; although Jurrien Timber has done so well in his absence that he might not immediately get the start back.

Adam Smith, who'd been looking so good at right-back for Bournemouth so far this season, did pick up a hamstring problem in the last game and will be out for some weeks. That is starting to leave Bournemouth stretched a bit thin at the back, and probably undermines the team's prospects in the next few fixtures.

Liam Delap also pulled a hamstring last time out against Fulham (muscle injuries are especially common early in the season, when players are pushing themselves a bit too hard when not quite fully fit), and is expected to be out for at least 10-12 weeks. Tyrique George or Marc Guiu (hastily recalled from loan at Sunderland) might deputise for him - providing the opportunity of a very cheap starting option for the third forward slot. In brighter news, Cole Palmer rejoined training with Chelsea on Thursday on Friday, and Maresa will make a last-minute decision whether he can be used for the game against Brentford; I'd guess he'll at least get some minutes off the bench.

Adam Wharton (apparently a recurrence of the earlier problem he'd only just recovered from) and Ismaila Sarr also had to withdraw with muscle injuries in the match against Villa - though neither are apparently too serious, and it is hoped they might be back before the end of the month.

Vitaliy Mykolenko, only just back from a lengthy absence, picked up a knock while training with Ukraine and is now a doubt again. So too is talismanic attacker Iliman Ndiaye, who suffered a knock while away with Senegal and will now face a late fitness test.

Leeds's Brazilian goalkeeper, Lucas Perri, has pulled a thigh muscle, and is expected to miss the next two weeks. Karl Darlow will deputise: another 4.0-million starter in that position - although those who've gone for the option of a cheap-but-largely-worthless second keeper are probably more than happy with Martin Dubravka. Forward Joel Piroe is doubtful with a slight calf strain - although it seemed his start might be at risk from Dominic Calvert-Lewin anyway.

Curtis Jones is out for this week, at least, having picked up some sort of knock in the match against Arsenal.

Omar Marmoush injured his knee playing for Egypt this week; it doesn't seem too bad, but no definite word on a recovery timeline yet. John Stones also pulled out of the England squad with a knock - though this might have been just one of those 'avoiding international duty' scams. And Rayan Ait-Nouri has an ankle injury from the Brighton game, is likely to be out for 5 or 6 weeks. With Kovacic and Cherki out fairly long-term, and Gvardiol, Foden, and Savinho only just returning to fitness, City are looking stretched a bit thin: there is even talk of Gundogan getting a start in midfield again - which would, I think, be potentially disastrous, even against such a floundering side as Manchester United.

Matheus Cunha had to come off in the first-half against Burnley with a pulled hamstring that looked quite serious. And Mason Mount withdrew at half-time, apparently with a recurrence of his previous long-term injury - so he might also be out for quite a while. Diogo Dalot pulled a muscle in training with Portugal, so will also be missing for a week or two, Paradoxically, I think the combined effect of these absences might actually be positive. Sesko (who has been a doubt for match-fitness, but just managed two full games for Slovenia, so ought to be OK to at least start) could finally slot into the No. 9 role (which neither Cunha nor Mbeumo like or thrive in), Bruno Fernandes will presumably have to take over the 'joint 10' role from Mount, where he'll be much more effective, Amad Diallo might now get at least a short run of starts at right wing-back, where he can be transformative for the team's attacking options (although the more defensively-minded Mazraoui might be preferred against City), and Ugarte or Mainoo will have to come into central midfield to support the canny but ponderously slow Casemiro - all good. (This is what you get when you make a bunch of glamorous signings who don't really fit your needs: you try to crowbar them in, and unbalance the whole team....)

Yoane Wissa is yet another who picked up an injury while with his national team (I'm surprised he was considered fit for call-up, after keeping himself out of team training this season). Jacob Ramsey, newly signed from Villa, also picked up an injury immediately on arriving at Newcastle. On the plus side, Joelinton might be just about ready to play again, after a few weeks out with a muscle strain; and Eddie Howe has said that their other new forward signing, Nick Woltemade, could be ready to go straight away.

Ola Aina pulled his hamstring playing for Nigeria; unclear yet how serious that is.

Niclas Fullkrug is a doubt for West Ham with a slight calf strain, and Graham Potter has expressed doubts about how many minutes Callum Wilson can handle.

Jorgen Strand Larsen is suffering with a sore Achilles, and could be out for some time.

Do we have any players who are dropped, or not looking likely to get the starts we hoped for?

Oleks Zinchenko is only on loan with Forest, and so ineligible to play against Arsenal this week.

Anthony Gordon is serving the second instalment of a three-match ban.

Several players could be sidelined, or see their minutes considerably reduced, by some of the new transfer window arrivals - most notably Hugo Ekitike and/or Cody Gakpo at Liverpool (and knock-on effects through the rest of the line-up might see increased rotation between Szoboslai, Macallister, and Wirtz too). However, that shouldn't become an issue for a while: Alexander Isak clearly isn't anywhere near match-fit yet, after absenting himself from training all season; and Arne Slot has said that he can't be expected to play 90 minutes for a few weeks yet, at least. I'd be surprised if he even makes the bench this week against Burnley.

Altay Bayindir seems very likely to be replaced in goal at Manchester United by new Belgian signing, Senne Lammens, but perhaps not straight away. (And the much reviled Andre Onana has, of course, left on loan to Trabzonspor in Turkey.) 

With many of the new signings, even where their fitness is not an issue, having arrived close to - or after the start of - the international break, they've had hardly any opportunity yet to train with their new teams, and so probably aren't going to be tactically up-to-speed enough for an immediate start. 

Did anyone give other cause to consider dropping them?

Manchester City have looked so flakey thus far (even the 'comfortable' win against Wolves wasn't as comfortable as all that; the game might have swung the other way if Wolves had been able to make some of their breakaways count), and are getting so stretched by injuries that I really wouldn't fancy any of their players at the moment.

And with Crystal Palace, you have to worry how they will adapt to the loss of Ebere Eze - particularly with their two next best creative players, Wharton and Sarr, also missing at the moment. If their attacking threat evaporates, their defence is likely to come under much more pressure too - and maybe it won't hold up.

A lot of FPL managers are also panicking about how the ousting of Nuno Espiritu Santo may unsettle Nottingham Forest; and especially about the possibility that his replacement, Ange Postecoglou, will undermine their previous defensive solidity (he did rather get himself the reputation at Spurs of obstinately chasing 4-3 wins....!). The more immediate worries for me are Nikola Milenkovic, who lacks the pace to cope well with maintaining a very high defensive line, as Ange usually likes, and could either get dropped completely, or find himself often having to commit professional fouls to thwart breakaways, and risk yellow or red cards; and also Chris Wood, who's probably too old and slow to lead the vigorous high press that is also a hallmark of Ange's style. Don't say you weren't warned. However, I thnk it's ridiculously over-hasty to be dropping anyone straight away (particularly with Burnley and Sunderland up next as opponents after this week's visit to The Emirates): and players like Sels, Murillo, Aina, and Ndoye might still prove to be decent long-term holds.

And I'm a bit wary of Arsenal at the moment: they've really been pretty unimpressive so far - and with Saka and Havertz out for a while, Odegaard only just back from a short absence with a shoulder injury, White and Saliba slight doubts at the back, Gyokeres still finding his feet, and newly-arrived Eze presumably set to be replacing Martinelli (probably an overall improvement, but nevertheless disruptive in the short term), and three more tricky fixtures up next.... I wouldn't be in a rush to have any of their players for FPL.

West Ham's rather lucky win against an out-of-sorts Forest last time didn't really suggest any major turnaround in form or self-belief; and they'd still be my favourites among the established Premier League clubs to make room for one of the promoted teams to survive this time - and also favourite for an early change of manager.

Manchester United - although I fancy their prospects a little better with the likely changes of lineup forced on them by injuries this week - have looked an absolute mess so far: they have no functional central midfield, can't decide who they want to use as their wing-backs, and their expensive new forward-line just hasn't been clicking at all. I really think Amorim needs to go as soon as possible, to save them from another season of floundering in lower mid-table. Nuno's available!

And although the three promoted sides have all got off to a fairly lively start, and picked up more points than they could have anticipated, none of them have yet done enough to persuade that they're likely to be able to stay up. So, I would avoid-like-the-plague any players from Sunderland, Burnley, or Leeds.... at least for a while longer.

That really narrows the player pool down A LOT. And with so many likely favourite picks - Saka, Palmer, Cunha - out injured, we have to cast the net wide through the more 'fringe' players we might not usually consider.

In gameweeks like this, there is also aways a grave risk that South American international players will be rested, or get only short minutes, because they've had to endure such a very long flight back across the Atlantic - usually only getting back, stiff and jet-lagged, a couple of days before their next Premier League game.

Moreover, the main phase of the Champions League kicks off this week with games over Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday evenings, and it is likely that teams may seek to protect their most important players with limited minutes or a complete rest ahead of those. That's particularly likely for Liverpool (facing Atletico Madrid), Chelsea (v. Bayern Munich), Manchester City (v. Napoli),... and Newcastle (v. Barcelona!!).

We just don't know who's going to start, who's going to get pulled off early, or who's going to play well this week. We'll all be lucky if we have 11 starting players in our squad. It is an utterly, utterly MAD week to be playing a chip in.

Did anyone play so well, you have to consider bringing them in immediately?

Well, an awful lot of players were banging in the goals for fun in the internationals over this past week or so; but most of those fixtures were so unbalanced that that doesn't really count for much.

And Gameweek 3 is a bit too distant now - especially with hardly any club training happening since - to use as a reliable guide. Everton have been looking very good so far, particularly Ndiaye, Grealish, and Dewsbury-Hall. And Dominik Szoboszlai has been outstanding at right-back for Liverpool (he would have been my pick for 'Player of the Month' - though it actually went to Grealish), but might now perhaps be rested (with the likely return to availability of Conor Bradley and Jeremie Frimpong), or be moved back into central midfield, where he might have a more constrained role.

For the rest, we'll just have to wait and see. The week after an international break is impossible to predict, full of surprises (most of them unpleasant!).

BEST OF LUCK, EVERYONE!

A little bit of Zen (59)

 

"All problems are important; but some are urgent, and some can wait."

Anonymous spokesman for the Vietnamese Communist government, shortly after Reunification in 1975

This is a somewhat ominous line, since it appears that the official here might have been intending to refer, at least partly, to the problem of internal dissent, and the Party's evolving plans for mass internment in 're-education through labour' camps. (In the first weeks after the fall of Saigon, the feared backlash against anyone associated with the government, military, or civil service of the former South Vietnam seemed not to be materialising, or at least not at anything like the rate or scale that had been widely anticipated. They took a couple of months on their planning before getting around to it....)

The general idea, though, has a broad applicability. A lot of FPL managers rush into drastic remedial action after only two or three 'bad' weeks, or even just one such week. They don't seem to realise how valuable that Wildcard will probably be a little later in the season, how wasteful is its early use (especially right at the start of the season!). They don't realise that it's very common to have a bad start to the season, when there are so many additional unpredictabilities about form and line-ups and results. They don't realise that two or three poor gameweeks back-to-back scarcely even counts as a disappointing 'run' - and that you can have several genuinely disappointing runs in a season, and will in fact be very lucky to get away with having fewer than 3 or 4 such spells. As I said at the end of that earlier post I just linked to: "A Wildcard is for emergencies; a bad Gameweek 1 (or even a bad opening three Gameweeks) is NOT an emergency."

Unless you find yourself in the rare, horrible condition of having made several obviously bad choices in your initial squad, already have several key players who are injured, or not getting the minutes you expected, or are just playing really, really badly (or are stuck in teams which are playing really badly, which is even more frustrating...),... then you should restrict yourself to isolated, 'essential' changes for now, trying to make do with your meagre ration of Free Transfers. And if you feel you really must make more changes than that, try to limit them to one or two, and bite the bullet on accepting the 'hit' - paying the points for the additional transfer(s).  Using the first Wildcard before the end of September (which is still early; only a few weeks after the end of the transfer window and the jarring interruption of the first international break: form and line-ups still haven't fully settled down....) is a sign of desperation, and almost always self-harming. DON'T DO IT - UNLESS YOU ABOLUTELY HAVE TO!!!

[I came across the above quotation last week in Andrea Pitzer's excellent book on the history of concentration camps, One Long Night - a grim read, but an informative and thought-provoking one.]

Counting down

 

The Summer Transfer Window drags on just that little bit longer this year. It's closing at 7pm on Monday 1st September, UK time - rather than the more traditional midnight on the 31st August (apparently because the 31st is a Sunday?). So, we have just about 75 more hours of suffering to endure.....

It seems to have been a particularly busy - and particularly acrimonious - spell of transfer activity this year, with 99 deals already concluded (according to Fantasy Football Scout's roundup), and Stuttgart striker Nick Woltemade today apparently set to become the 100th, when his move to Newcastle is confirmed. (Who?? Yeah, not the biggest blip on the 'Top European Forwards' Radar....)

Now, if that Woltemade signing goes through, the door could be open for Isak to finally complete his contentious move to Liverpool. (I really hope that doesn't go ahead. They're only buying him because he's available, and they can afford him, and he seems like too good an opportunity to pass up; but they don't need him - at the moment, I think they'd be better off without him...)  And if that happens, the thus-far brilliant Ekitike might get dropped to make room for him; and indeed, Gakpo might find himself suddenly minutes-sharing too. So, this one superficially unexciting piece of transfer activity could have massive repercussions for FPL.

Likewise, two more of last year's highest-scoring forwards in FPL, Watkins and Wissa, are still looking for a move, which might come to pass over the final few days of the window. And if that should happen, and they move to another Premier League club rather than leaving the country, that might greatly enhance their perceived value in FPL. But it might also gravely undermine the value of all of their former teammates at the clubs they've left without a top striker,.... unless they can obtain a top replacement at the last minute. Jorgen Strand Larsen might also become a much more attractive FPL property if he gets a move to a better club (and Wolves might be even deeper in the toilet...). And Xavi Simons's move to Spurs might actually become one of the most influential acquisitions of the window.  So much could still surprise and confound us over the next few days.

Perhaps we'll have a quiet weekend, and Woltemade will be the last deal concluded. But, typically, there's a huge last-minute rush in the final few hours of a window. With the best part of a whole extra day available this year, the possibilities for further business are enormous.

I wouldn't be going anywhere near a Wildcard until all the dust has settled from this frenzy of club-swapping and squad-strengthening. Indeed, I wouldn't want to be going anywhere near one until at least the end of September, by which time we'll have had a few weeks to observe new club line-ups in action, and form starting to develop...  At present, we really don't have much idea at all what the new season is going to look like. And any changes we make to our FPL teams now are likely to be rendered irrelevant within the next month or so.

Early Wildcard?

 

"Oh, damn, six of my players were disappointing this week. But, hey, what, there's a way I could replace them ALL??" 

That seems  to be the attitude of many FPL managers - reeling in pain after a low-scoring opening week, they suddenly 'remember' their Wildcard, as if it were a pleasant surprise, like an unexpectedly generous gift left under their pillow by the Tooth Fairy. And they embrace it as their SALVATION.

It would be less funny and painful if it were only the most naive newbies that fell for this misguided foolishness, but actually an awful lot of long-time players give in to this sort of 'buyers' remorse' at the start of the season and blow a Wildcard after 1 or 2 gameweeks. 

The thing is, you don't really know if someone is a 'bad pick' after one game (or even two or three, most of the time), so it's crazy to make judgements that quickly. Almost all of the best and most fancied players had a fairly subdued opening game this year. That often happens. It doesn't mean they won't start getting into their usual groove this week, or next... And last week's top performers - Ekitike, Reijnders, Gibbs-White - aren't yet in 'hot form'; they've had one good game. They could very easily have a stinker this week,... or not start at all.

This game craps on you so often and so hard that even if you do find yourself with a number of absolutely horrible players in your initial squad that you really need to dump as soon as possible, there will almost certainly be a few occasions over the next four months where you have more players than that suddenly dropped/injured/suspended..... 

Wildcard is for emergencies; a bad GW1 is NOT an emergency.

The great CHIP Dilemma

This conundrum presents itself every year - In what order should we play our Free Hit and 2nd Wildcard chips?

In general, the Free Hit would seem better suited to helping you dance around the problem of a big Blank Gameweek - when many top teams, and hence many of your best players, may be missing from the action for one week only.

And the Wildcard is traditionally preserved for use just ahead of the big Double Gameweek, which usually follows close after it,... but this year, oddly, is going to precede it. (You might, of course, use your Wildcard in the Double Gameweek; but a big Double is usually a good opportunity to get the most out of the Bench Boost chip - and, since you can only use one chip per gameweek, people tend to use their Wildcard to 'set up' their squad to optimise all 15 players with the best fixtures the week before the Double so that they can use Bench Boost the following week.)

However, there's no hard-and-fast rule: you always need to stay flexible in your approach to chip play.

The optimum use of the chips in any given year will depend on how the fixtures break on those crucial weekends (do the blanks/doubles involve a lot of your players, or not?), and on the subsequent run of fixtures (do you actually want to keep most of your doublers for more than that one gameweek?).

For Gameweeks 33/34 this year, with only a small number of teams involved, and mostly not the most popular ones in FPL at the moment - it was really looking as though, for most FPL managers, you'd probably only want additional players from the doubling teams in GW33, but not thereafter (indeed, you might even want to reduce or eliminate your exposure to those teams by removing some of your long-term holds from them, because their form was stuttering or ther run-ins looked a little shakey). In contrast, many of the players you were loading up on in the subsequent Blank Gameweek 34 were not just one-week makeweights, but players coming into form and/or facing a promising final month of fixtures, players you would want to keep for the remainder of the season.

And thus.... playing the Free Hit for the double in GW33 and the Wildcard for the blank in GW34 was probably the more sensible option this time around.

It can work out either way. But it's usually very much better one way than the other - and that can be a tricky choice to make.... And the answer could be different in each year. [At least, that's how it is now - since we no longer have any truly big Blank/Double Gameweeks to worry about, as the FA Cup Quarter-Final weekend has been removed from the League programme from this year. In the past, with a really huge Blank and Double resulting from up to 8 rearranged fixtures, the case for using Free Hit to survive the BIG Blank was pretty overwhelming...]

Wildcard THIS week??

 

Hell, NO!!!

The 'chips' in general, and perhaps - strangely - the Wildcard in partcular.... well, it seems to burn a hole in people's pockets: they grow impatient to get rid of it.

So, although there are still 9 more gameweeks in which one might play the 2nd Wiildcard,.... an awful lot of folk seem to be intent on activating it for Gameweek 30.

There are several reasons why this probably isn't a great idea:

1)  As I pointed out some months back, in relation to hazarding the Triple Captain chip in the gameweek after an international break, it's non-ideal to play a chip straight after a break because of the additional uncertainty that now surrounds the next batch of fixtures. After the long hiatus from Premier League football, teams and individuals have been knocked out of their usual rhythm and 'form' may suddenly be dramatically different when things resume. Plus, of course, there is enormous scope for new injuries to have arisen in the two-and-a-half weeks since everyone last played a league match. And in fact, those who were not involved in international duty nor in this coming weekend's FA Cup ties might be the most problematic - because clubs often keep quiet about training-ground mishaps until the very eve of the next match. You really don't have much idea how the GW30 matches are going to go, or who's going to be available (and there might be a few nasty surprises that emerge only after the deadline, since the matches are staggered over three days). Making even one or two regular transfers in these circumstances is nerve-wracking enough; hazarding a whole squad rebuild is.... utter INSANITY. 

2)  At the moment we have the further complication that a couple of top players are poised to return from injury soon (Saka and Jackson [and NO, I don't put Jackson on the same level as Saka; he might not even be in contention for a squad place himself, but.... his reintroduction for Chelsea could have a huge impact on Palmer's productivity!), and a couple more from extended suspensions (Cunha and Gordon). If they start producing their best form again, you might want them... And their contributions could have a major impact on the value of certain of their teammates too. But we won't know about this for a few weeks yet. Having some of the most important selection decisions of the remainder of the season looming over us like this is another reason to defer using the WildCard, if possible.

3) There can't be much legitimate pretext for most people to need to Wildcard now. There haven't - yet - been any major new long-term injuries. And there aren't any major turns in fixtures happening that might make you want to consider wholesale squad changes on grounds of fixture-difficulty. (OK, Fulham, Everton, Brentford, and Manchester United are now facing tough runs of fixtures; but they're not clubs you should have had many - or any! - players from anyway.)

4)  There are clearly much stronger tactical occasions for using the 2nd Wildcard still to come. If you've blown your Free Hit already, you'll almost certainly need your Wildcard instead to help you get around the looming catastrrophe of a big Blank Gameweek in GW34. If you've still got the FH in hand for that, there's going to be at least one more - perhaps also a second - Double Gameweek in the final weeks of the season, with the resheduled games from the FA Cup Semi-Final weekend. Many FPL managers traditionally regard such Double Gameweeks as a prime opportunity to deploy the Bench Boost chip; this year, those doubles are probably going to be too small to make that a particularly attractive play, but still, even without the bonus chip staked on it, a DGW will benefit from a major squad shake-up that week (or the week prior, if you are going for the Bench Boost) - that's what you should be keeping your Wildcard for. (If you don't have the Bench Boost still to use, but you do have both the Wildcard and the Free Hit, you enjoy the leeway to decide which order to play them in. If you don't fancy your doubling players that much for the other remaing gameweeks, it could make more sense to use the Free Hit for that Double Gameweek and play the Wildcard in GW34 - rather than vice versa.)

5)  Some people want to try to 'set up' for the coming Double Gameweeks by Wildcarding NOW - but it's way too early. At the time most of these folk were activatig the chip, they didn't even know which teams would have progressed to the FA semi-finals (and thus be blanking in FPL in Gameweek 34); and we almost certainly still won't know when those missing GW34 games will be rescheduled before the GW30 deadline on Tuesday evening. It's really too early even to think about 'optimising' for the already setttled Double Gameweek in GW32: that's still two weeks away, and players you bring in now might not still be available then (and some of them might not be ideal for the two intervening gameweeks...). Rebuilding a squad with a Wildcard even one week in advance of a big gameweek (most commonly, because you want to play Bench Boost in a BIG double) can backfire, with multiple injuries and suspensions hitting in the intervening week. Trying to do it two or three weeks ahead is asking for trouble.

6)  Some years.... the Cup fixtures break in such a way that you can thread your way through the end-of-season blanks and doubles without needing to use your Wildcard or Free Hit (without needing to use both of them, anyway!). In that happy circumstance, it's rather nice just to be able to drop a remaining 'rebuild chip' in the last week or two of the season to enable you to blitz one of your cup competitions...

As so often, the blame for this mass delusion spreading over the Interwebs seems to lie with FPL's inane anonymous 'pundit', The Scout, who's published a 'Wildcard squad' for this week - and that seems to have given all The Sheep the idea that this is a good week to play the Wildcard.  It's NOT, not at all.

Occasionally, Fate craps on you from a great height and you are obliged to play a Wildcard at such a non-ideal time just because of a sudden combination of injuries, fixture swings, and losses of form. Ultimately, you play your Wildcards when you need to - whenever you have urgent squad changes that have to be made all at once, and the total is at least 3 or 4 more than the number of Free Transfers you have available. (Even a surplus need over Free Transfers of 3 or 4 is very borderline: you probably ought to consider whether you can defer one or two of those changes for another week or so.... or eat the extra 'hits'!)

But it's very difficult to envisage why anybody would be in such a predicament now. You really ought to hang on to your Wildcard a bit longer...

When to use the 2nd Wildcard?

 

Good grief - the FPL forums at the moment seem to be full of people proposing to play their 2nd Wildcard this week! Which, of course, prompts me to ask, "WHY?"

'Truisms' often irritate, because they are used over-frequently and often unthinkingly... But there are two truisms about the Wildcards that are in fact usefully TRUE.

1)  A Wildcard tends to become more valuable the longer you can hang on to it. (That's not to say the best time to use it is in the last possible week; but it certainly is worth resisting the impulse to use it early during its period of availability.)

2)  How early you use your Wildcards is usually a precise indicator how how badly you're doing in the game. (Again, that's not saying that it's always a bad decision in itself to use a Wildcard early; certainly, for the 1st one - as I've discussed before - there can be good reasons for using it early; but that does indicate that you've had a dreadful start to the season, and are needing to take drastic action to recover the situation. If you're using a Wildcard early because you absolutely have to, that's bad; if you don't absolutely have to, but you're using it early anyway, that's very, very bad.)

Using the 2nd Wildcard the instant it becomes available smacks of impatience, impulsivity, and just making changes out of boredom rather than any pressing need. Even if you don't accept the arguments in favour of keeping it for the last stages of the season (which I'll get to in a moment), there are rarely any good reasons for using it NOW. In fact, if the first half of the season has gone well for you, you might have been able to hold on to your 1st Wildcard until quite recently. I know some people who've only finally used it in GW18 or GW19. (I have much admiration and envy for them!!)

And even if you haven't Wildcarded just recently, you have had half a season to get your squad in shape. If you feel the need to make a bunch of changes now - and you really do need to - then you must have been making some terrible choices up until now.

At the beginning of the season, we're all just making blind guesses about which players and teams are going to be in the best form, and even perhaps about what team selections and tactics are going to be. It's almost inevitable that many of those guesses will turn out to be wrong, perhaps some of them disastrously wrong, and - if we avoided resorting to the remedial surgery of an early Wildcard - it may take some time to sort our squads out. But by GW19, that really should have happened. Unless we've had a lot of bad luck with injuries, we should really have had a fairly stable lineup for a month or so now (and have been giving our attention to hoarding up some spare Free Transfers!).

Occasionally, there may be a couple of factors that may prompt us to consider a very early 2nd Wildcard. These are: a rash of injuries to key players at the end of December; and/or a major 'turn' of fixtures (upcoming matches looking suddenly much harder) for a number of the big teams. Neither of those is the case this year. Saka and Bowen are the only big names to be ruled out in the last month. And only West Ham and Wolves (and, to a rather lesser extent, Bournemouth and Brentford) are facing an imminent bad fixture run; and they're not exactly major clubs.

So, what are the advantages of hanging on to the Wildcard for a later date?

i)  We're in a transfer window. Some exciting new players may enter the league; others may suddenly leave. (It's unlikely to be a particularly busy window, I think; although, you never know! Manchester City and Arsenal, and perhaps also Manchester United will probably be looking for one or two big purchases. And I really can't see the logic of getting Trent Alexander-Arnold in on a Wildcard now, when he might be leaving for Spain in a week or two...)  There really is not much point in using the Wildcard before or during this phase of transfer activity, when there are going to be a number of new options to consider in a month's time, and the possibility you might then want to make multiple changes at once. Transfer speculation also adds greatly to the uncertainty of match results in this period: players involved in negotiations may be removed from squads. Team dynamics and individuals' morale may be adversely affected by the introduction of new stars, or the loss of old ones - or merely the mooted possibility of such changes. Blowing the Wildcard now is like spending your life savings on a 'Mystery Box': you have no idea what you're getting - you just don't know how the EPL is going to play out this month, or what it's going to look like going into February.

ii)  We're still in the depths of 'the bleak midwinter'. Cold weather and insane fixture congestion at this time of year mean that there continues to be a greatly increased risk of injury over the coming month or more. And you don't really want to blow your Wildcard on bringing in a bunch of players who might become unavailable almost immediately. Of course, there is some risk of such ill fortune whenever you play it; but the risk is much higher from December through February.

iii)  The 2nd Wildcard can be very valuable in negotiating the selection challenges of the Blank Gameweeks (gameweeks with less than the full number of fixtures; some clubs not playing in that week) and Double Gameweeks (where clubs that missed out in a previous Blank Gameweek make up their postponed fixture by playing two games within one gameweek, offering you a chance of higher points from their players). Now, these are likely to be much less of a problem than they have been in the past, because we've lost two of the four regularly occurring occasions for them (the Club World Cup has been moved from December to June/July, and the FA Cup quarter-finals are now to be played on a weekend emptied of EPL fixtures); thus, we are left with only the League Cup Final (GW29; affected teams probably getting a DGW in GW33) and the FA Semis (GW34; follow-up DGW probably in GW36 or 37). Also, the new rule allowing us to hoard up to 5 Free Transfers - effectively a 'mini-Wildcard' (if we could ever manage to save that many transfers....) - could make it a lot easier to get through these bothersome chicanes this year.

However, even the relatively small interruption of the League Cup Final can be pretty devastating - if you happen to have 2 or 3 players from each of the 4 affected teams (not just the finalists themselves, but whoever they were drawn against in the League that weekend); so devastating that even if you have got 3, 4, or 5 Free Transfers in the bank, you might still not be able to get to a full eleven without taking a lot of 'hits' as well. And even if you can address this problem with Free Transfers and/or paid 'hits', you might want to use a 'makeover chip' to rebuild your squad to its regular shape immediately in the following gameweek. Alternatively, there may be circumstances where it seems better to use the Wildcard to create an 'ideal' squad for this eccentric gameweek, but structure it in such a way that you can quickly restore it to is more normal shape with transfers over the next two or three gameweeks.

The Free Hit is, naturally, the best chip to use for sorting out a one-off problem like this. But you only have one of those, and this challenge is going to present itself at least twice in the second half of our season. (Just be grateful that it's no longer four or more times in a season! The FA Quarter-Finals used to be a colossal clusterfuck....)  It might yet arise more than twice; we've already seen one fixture postponed because of high winds, and more recently several others came close to being called off because of severe fog. As I pointed out in this post on the main hazard of The New Chip, there are all kinds of things that might lead to multiple postponements on one weekend. If that should happen, it's nice - very, very, very comforting! - to have the option of using either the Wildcard or the Free Hit to deal with the gaping holes it could leave in your squad.  

The common expectation of 'chip strategy' this year is that it will probably be best to hold on to your Free Hit to get around the FA Semis in Gameweek 34. But it would be very valuable to hang on to your Wildcard at least until Gameweek 29 as a back-up option for coping with this kind of last-minute emergency.

And it is also possible - though a much rarer eventuality - that teams with a Double Gameweek also have favourable fixtures following, and thus (especially if you're also developing a high level of dissatisfaction with some members of your current squad...) it may be appropriate to drop the Wildcard in that Double Gameweek to load up on more players from these teams that are playing twice, and that you're happy to keep on afterwards.

iv)  The other prime candidate for an especially valuable use of the Wildcard late in the season has traditionally been to 'set up' optimally to exploit your Bench Boost chip in a Double Gameweek. If you play your Wildcard the week before the DGW, you can be reasonably confident of having every member of your squad being a starter, and as many of them as possible having double-fixtures (and good fixtures). It is difficult to do this just with transfers, because you don't know until a few weeks ahead who the teams involved will be. (And even if you could do it that way, it tends to be non-ideal, because you're probably moving some players out of your team much earlier than you'd like to, just to optimise for the coming double-fixture week. Again, this might be more possible this year to do in one go, through having saved up 5 Free Transfers; but it would be very tricky to pull that off.) There were only two scheduled Double Gameweeks this year (we now have a third one, thanks to the Everton v Liverpool postponement a few weeks back), rather than four, which was the common minimum until now (we'd also grown rather used to having even more additional ones occur in recent years due to things like Covid outbreaks and the death of the Queen); and only one 'big' one, the rearranged fixtures from the FA Semi-Final weekend being crammed in right before the end of the season. While I always counsel that it is very risky - for all sorts of reasons - to wait until then to play a chip,.... most experienced FPL managers will probably be planning to play their Bench Boost in that last Double Gameweek.... and their 2nd Wildcard in the week before (judging that the potentially substantial benefits of this strategy outweigh the risks).

v)  While there are very strong arguments for saving the Wildcard as a contingency for addressing possible Blank Gameweeks, or for setting up for a Bench Boost attempt in a 'big' Double Gameweek,... as I've said in regard to the 1st Wildcard, there can be no hard-and-fast rules: we always need to stay flexible in deciding how we can best use our chips. It can occasionally happen that we're clobbered with multiple injuries, suspensions, and sudden and catastrophic dips in form for key teams or players in quick succession - perhaps even in the space of just one week. And if we've also been taking a chance on carrying one or two people on the bench who we thought might be short-term injuries but turn out to be rather longer-term, and perhaps we haven't been paying enough attention to a looming turn in fixtures for two or three of the sides that we've taken the most players from... then we are indeed most royally screwed. If you suddenly find yourself with 6, 7, 8 gaps in your line-up you urgently need to fill - and you don't have many saved Free Transfers to help you out - that's when you need to consider playing your Wildcard.

vi)  So, I've outlined two reasons why it's just A BAD IDEA to play the Wildcard at the start of January, and given three more why there are likely going to be occasions later in the season when it will be far more valuable. But I'd also suggest simply considering THE ODDS: there are 19 occasions during the rest of the season when you could play this chip. You need to be really, really sure that the week you choose to play it is almost certainly going to be the best possible one. It's really hard to be that confident when there are 18 other opportunities to play it still ahead of you. It becomes a little easier, a little less stressful and uncertain with each passing week; once you get to GW28 or GW29, and there are almost as many gameweeks in which to use the chip behind you as there are still to come, it becomes more possible to make a confident determination - rather than just a wild guess. I think it is very likely that almost all of the remaining weeks of the season will offer a better opportunity to get the best out of the 2nd Wildcard than Gameweek 20 - for absolutely everyone. I am also quite certain that probably about half of them will be much better; and at least 3 or 4 of them will be much, much, much better.

vii)  And finally.... if you have - by some great good fortune - managed to sail through the second half of the season without encountering any huge injury crises or unexpected mass postponements, and if you've been able to safely navigate the expected Blank and Double Gameweeks, and even get the best out of your Bench Boost, just by using regular transfers (and perhaps the occasional 'hit').... well, good for you, you are truly blessed. Such things are very possible, from time to time; but you won't know until the end of the season.

And let me assure you, on the rare, blessed occasions when this may happen, there is no greater pleasure in Fantasy Premier League than being able to drop an unexpected, unused Wildcard - or Free Hit! - as a late-season 'smart-bomb' to get you through a tricky final (or perhaps even the semi-, or quarter- ) against a bitter rival in the 'Cup' competition of one of your mini-leagues. Honestly, that possibility alone always makes it worth thinking twice - and thrice, and four times! - about using the 2nd Wildcard for anything else earlier on!

So, in summary, if you are thinking of playing your 2nd Wildcard in Gameweek 20 - What is wrong with you, are you completely BATSHIT INSANE??  PLEASE, DON'T DO IT!!!

And DON'T FORGET The Boycott:

#QuitFPLinGW23         #DownWithTheNewChip

When to use the 1st Wildcard

 

A lot of self-important twerps in the FPL online forums like to pontificate that there are rigid rules for this - that you cannot possibly use your first Wildcard before 'the first big turn in the fixtures' (whenever they deem that to be...), or not before some arbitrary, distant date like... Gameweek 15.

That's all nonsense, of course.

The answer is, you play it when you need to.

Certainly, it's nice to be able to hang on to it as long as possible. 

In an ideal world, I like to keep mine right up until the GW19 cutoff for using it (unless it's a year when we have the midwinter Asian and African Cups to worry about, in which case it can be handy to drop it a bit earlier, to swap out the players departing for those tournaments). We tend to get a lot of injuries during the winter fixture logjam, and the second half of the season (as the fixtures reset) does tend to form a fairly distinct new phase of action; so, there are good reasons for fancying a major rebuild around then.

And there shouldn't be any reason to want to do so any earlier than that - unless things have gone badly wrong.

But, alas, in FPL things very commonly do go very badly wrong.

Indeed, that is most likely to happen right at the start of the season! We're all largely betting blind as we go into Gameweek 1. We don't really know which players or teams are going to be in form; and there are usually some big surprises in store for us. Our initial squad is nothing but a collection of hopeful guesses; and many of those guesses will turn out to be wrong. Sometimes, nearly all of them will! Moreover, injuries early in the season tend to be extremely common - as players push themselves just a little bit too hard when not yet quite fully match-fit; when things really go badly for you, you can easily lose 4 or 5 players to early injuries in the first few weeks of the season.

If that happens, it's perfectly reasonable to go with a Wildcard very early in the season - to rectify those unfortunate wrong guesses and/or strokes of cruel fortune.

If you've had a disastrous opening to the season, you should probably try to hang tough for a few weeks, to see how everyone's form develops; Gameweek 1 isn't always a reliable guide to how things are going to go. Indeed, many of the top clubs have a bit of a habit of being slow out of the blocks, and may only start to show their true capability after four or five weeks, or more. So, it's worth hanging on a bit, to assess the situation. Gameweek 5 is still pretty early to play a Wildcard; but I can see that really exteme circumstances might sometimes seem to warrant using it in Gameweek 4 or Gameweek 3.....

My basic rule-of-thumb is: If the number of changes you desperately want to make (injured already, transferred out of the league, unexpectedly not starting, or just in really poor form) MINUS the number of Free Transfers you have available is MORE THAN 5, then it's legitimate to resort to the Wildcard.

A Wildcard is typically used to make at least 6 or 7 or 8 transfers. It is a bit of a waste to use one for any less than that.

If the number produced by my formula is only 4 or 5, probably not all of those changes are absolutely essential (probably 1 or 2 of those unwanted players are at least starting - and might yet rediscover their scoring boots), and you could take a chance on leaving your bench empty for a week or two. You could even consider taking a few 'hits' - spending points for additional transfers. But in all probability, you can just be patient, and make the desired changes with Free Transfers over the next few weeks. Even if your surplus of needed changes over available transfers is 6 or 7, it might still be a marginal call whether the Wildcard is the best option; don't use it rashly.

In a nutshell, you drop your first Wildcard as late as you can,... but as early as you need to.

Oops - he did it AGAIN!

 

I joked last week that we might already have seen 'peak Haaland' for this season - at least in terms of his points-per-game average.  And then the bugger goes and gets another hattrick!!

Now, it would be absolutely astonishing if he managed to register THREE hattricks in successive weeks. (I don't think that's ever been done in the Premier League? And probably not in top flight football anywhere in the world, ever in history? But dammit, he is a record-smashing machine... Maybe it could happen??)  And, statistically, it does seem rather improbable that he'll even pick up a brace again for another month or so now....

But he is in exceptional form: probably the sharpest and most confident we've ever seen him. And that is utterly terrifying!

And it is prompting many people to revisit The Big Question I considered before the start of the season, whether a with-Haaland or without-Haaland squad was likely to be the best option for FPL this year.

I think that question is more open than we might have expected - an early switch of strategy more tempting - not just because of Haaland's exceptional start to the season, but because of the impressiveness of our options at the lower end of the price scale. No, we don't have any 4.0 starting keepers (like Areola last year) or unexpectedly starting and oustandingly good cheap defenders (like Gusto and Van Hecke); and we don't have a 'Player of the Season' available for only 5.0 (Palmer was a once-in-a-decade-or-two FPL miracle!!). But we do suddenly have Arrizabalaga, Johnstone, Verbruggen, and Ramsdale added to the pool of very decent keeper options at only 4.5 (I'd probably stick with Areola and Henderson as the strongest two at the moment; but Hermansen, Sels, and Muric could also emerge as tempting, more left-field picks); there's even a chance that 4.0 Fabianski might get a few starts, after Areola apparently hurt himself with a bad landing in the City game this weekend. Up front, we've got Wood, Wissa, Welbeck, Joao Pedro, Delap, Vardy, Calvert-Lewin, Duran and Strand-Larsen among the leading scorers so far - all priced between 5.0 and 6.0 million. And - outside of the inevitable Liverpool and Arsenal (and the slightly less inevitable Spurs!) back lines - all the top 15 highest-scoring defenders started the season at only 4.5 million. In particular, Rico Lewis getting a regular start at City (for now) is a huge bonus. And, to fill out the last couple of seats on the bench, there are even some OK defenders starting who cost only 4.0 million: Nedeljković, Faes, Harwood-Bellis.

Above all, there are some very strong-looking cheaper midfield options; and that is the area of the field where most of your points are usually produced. A With-Haaland squad would not be viable, I don't think, unless we could assemble a full roster of 5 strong attacking midfielders with the remains of our budget. But we have the likes of Smith Rowe, Semenyo, Iwobi, Rogers, Murphy, Wharton, Hudson-Odoi, Adingra, Minteh, Diallo, Kluivert, Tavernier, Sinisterra all looking like more-than-decent prospects to take up the last one or two spots in midfield.

It is looking perfectly possible to assemble a Haaland-Salah-Palmer squad that includes at least one other premium player, and doesn't go ridiculously light in any area of the pitch (NO non-playing bench!!). You only get into trouble, I think, if you rashly opt for Raya or Alisson in goal, and/or one or two of the more premium defenders. With Arsenal and Liverpool looking so solid, it is very likely that players from their defences will substantially out-perform almost all others, but.... will they do so by enough of a margin to justify the huge extra outlay?? That remains doubtful: the spread of points across the best keepers is usually fairly small; the spread across defenders - except for a few outliers sometimes - not much greater. Extra money spent almost always yields more points in midfield.

I can see why so many people are getting tempted to go for an early use of the Wildcard this week (I will probably have more to say on that before long): many of those who initially opted to go without Haaland - perhaps the majority - have had a change of heart. (It's probably safe to assume that almost no-one is moving the other way, and dropping him!)  I hope that's not just short-term reactionism, getting spooked by his two hattricks (you've already missed those: let it go....).  If you're going to make this momentous switch (as I think I will myself), it needs to be because you've carefully considered the overall budget constraints and the available player pool. At the start of the season, we didn't know how many of these cheaper options would be starting, or how good their prospects might be; now that is becoming more apparent, we have a better picture of what a strong With-Haaland squad could be.